November 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Sunday, February 4th, 2007 09:56 am
... and hasn't he matured *hem* nicely? Courtesy of [livejournal.com profile] superfoo comes this raahther lovely (anyone else of my generation remember the Typhoo tea ads?) pic of our Daniel Radcliffe in his new incarnation as sex symbol, in his role in Equus, put discreetly behind the cut





No wonder the society matrons are worried about what to tell their children. I should imagine they're locking up their daughters as we speak :)
Sunday, February 4th, 2007 07:35 pm (UTC)
Of course, the whole point about Equus is that Alan is the opposite of a sex symbol - he's a loser who can't even - ahem - keep it up when the girl seduces him, which is why he blinds all the horses.

Peter Firth did the role originally (Harry in Spooks/MI5)as this picture shows. My bet is he was better than Daniel will be.

Incidentally, my tame fifteen-year-old took one look at the set of promo shots on the theatre website and announced "He is so not fit!"
Monday, February 5th, 2007 12:46 am (UTC)
HE BLINDS THE HORSES BECAUSE HE IS IMPOTENT???

This play keeps getting more intruiging.
Monday, February 5th, 2007 12:56 am (UTC)
Oops. I've just given away the big climax. (To coin a phrase. *g*)

To him the horses have taken the place of God, and his confusion about sex and religion create a powerful and disturbing mixture.

It really is worth reading, if you can't see it. The horses are amazing, though, in a live show - men with wire-frame horses' heads and hooves, thus eight feet tall in effect.