intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Thursday, July 15th, 2010 08:50 am
I can't believe it's taking me so long to get through 50 books, remembering the days when I used to read 8 or 10 a week, never mind 50 in a year... At this rate, I won't succeed in this challenge :(

I think I need to spend less time online. Oh... maybe I'd better keep these comments fairly short.

Anyway - here goes #23 Neil Gaiman, The Sandman Preludes and Nocturnes; The Sandman The Dollshouse )Frances Hardinge, Fly By Night )Sarah Shun-Lien Bynum, Ms Hempel Chronicles ) Susan Cooper, King of Shadows ) Geraldine McCaughrean, The Death Defying Pepper Roux )
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Sunday, May 16th, 2010 09:47 am
Catching up with my reading log (and yikes, I'm doing okay, but I'm going to have to get my skates on if I'm to read 50 books this year):
The Hunger Games )
Fire )
A Conspiracy of Kings )
The Uncommon Reader )
Darkwood )
Lips Touch, Three Times )
American Gods )
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Saturday, April 3rd, 2010 09:01 am
A trio of fantasy/sf

#8 Anne Osterlund, Academy 7

In a universe far, far away, but obviously a distant colony of ours (they celebrate Christmas!), Dane and Aerin are two misfits - one, the son of privilege, the other a refugee with a mysterious past - who find themselves against the odds at an exclusive Academy. Not unpredictably, they become friends and discover secrets about themselves and each other.

The world is intriguing (though I have to confess thinking it unlikely and rather unimaginative that they DID in fact still celebrate Christmas), the characters likeable and believable, and the revelations interesting and not unbelievable. I liked the school, and would have liked to see more of it.

Overall, an enjoyable read, marred by some extremely clunky writing. Overwritten descriptions and things like an emotion that "blared" into a face, redundancy with "both," and an agreement error with "everyone" (where was her editor???).

#9 Cassandra Clare, City of Bones

Normally, I'm a sucker for urban fantasy, but this one, though much more accomplished than the previous entry, left me cold. I had trouble finishing it, and definitely won't bother with the rest of the trilogy.

#10 Galen Beckett, The Magicians and Mrs Quent

This is regency romance in a quite intriguing alternate world, though one whose laws of physics defy ... um, laws of physics ... but still. Although very well written (the most accomplished stylistically of the three), rather too much of too many different things. Very derivative - Jane Austen meets Charlotte Bronte meets Suzanna Clarke. My other complaint is that for a romance, the romance was EXTREMELY dull, almost off-stage. I mean, I don't necessarily want a bodice ripper, but I'd like a bit more emotion. Good enough, however, that I will probably read the next book in the series (and, sigh, yes, this does appear to be the first of a series).
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Sunday, March 7th, 2010 02:32 pm
Enchanted Glass, Diana Wynne Jones

I think from now on, DWJ is moving off my "buy immediately in hardcover" list. There hasn't now been a book that I haven't been slightly disappointed in since Deep Secret, which was the last of the "true" genius DWJ novels, imo.

This one was okay. I liked the domesticity of it, the focus of the action mostly in one small village. I liked the fact that for once there were healthy relationships between the protagonist and adults; Aidan had a grandmother who loved him and whom he grieves for and then goes to live with his... uncle? cousin?? I can't remember - Andrew, who is nice, and treats him well. The system of magic was quite interesting, but not fully worked out (it seems to be about seeing, but turns into performative speech again at the end). The idea of the "counterparts" was quite interesting.

The overall plot was pretty predictable and seemed... unimportant. The ending was rushed, as often happens in DWJ novels. Most of the characters, other than Andrew and Aidan, seemed more like caricatures than people. There was some rather distasteful attitude towards the overweight and the mentally challenged, and I particularly disliked the reference to the mentally challenged man as fat _because_ there was something not-quite-right about his mind.

It was fun, but nothing earth-shattering. Sigh.
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Sunday, February 21st, 2010 04:53 pm
Connie Willis, Blackout

Connie Willis is one of my absolute favourite sf authors, always reliable, but sadly not prolific - I can't remember exactly how long it's been since the last novel, but I do remember that my mother was still alive when I was reading Passage. This long-awaited new novel did not disappoint, except to the extent that we are left with our characters in dire straits at the end of it. But we know that the next one will be out in the Fall, so there's not too long to wait. It is set in the future of The Domesday Book and To Say Nothing of the Dog; time travel is real, and Oxford historians are queuing up to make trips into the past to do research. This time, our main characters are visiting different events in WWII, except that somehow things don't go quite as planned. There are as always very likeable characters and a zippy, almost too breathless plot, with wrong turns and mistakes and suspense. It is as always meticulously researched, which made a few details that I think are probably errors stand out rather: I don't think a WWII nurse would have used a centigrade scale to describe a person's temperature, or that a British person would use the term "blocks" in London (as in "just a few more blocks, and we'll be there"), or that someone would have bought grapes for someone in hospital without having to do some black-market dealing, or at least mentioning queues or coupons... But these are forgivable in the overall context of a very enjoyable and un-put-downable book. I can't wait for October!
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Sunday, February 21st, 2010 04:40 pm
Yoko Ogawa, The Housekeeper and the Professor

This was a birthday gift, so I'm glad to be able to report that I enjoyed it very much. It's a quiet, graceful book. Somehow very Japanese in its understated elegance and slight oddness. It is about - yes - a housekeeper who looks after a professor who, although a mathematical genius, can remember only 80 minutes at a time. It's mostly about friendship, quiet and tentative. What I like most about it is that it doesn't try and introduce any kind of romance; it really is about friendship. And symmetries. And patterns. And mathematics. For some reason, my brain can cope with quantum physics, but it doesn't cope all that well with math. I have to confess that much of the math just went in one side of my brain and out the other, but that didn't impede my enjoyment of the novel. Except I feel that I ought to re-read it to try and understand the math better. Maybe I will.
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Friday, January 29th, 2010 08:50 am
Kristin Cashore, Graceling

WHOOSH! (That's the book galloping by).

I don't know why it took me over a week to finish: possibly because much of last week I spent in a bit of a funk being tired and depressed and preoccupied and consequently was falling asleep over my book at night and not getting much reading done. But that's by the by.

It was thoroughly enjoyable. Likeable (why is LJ spellcheck balking on that word?) characters, a very intriguing system of magic/special powers, a believable romance. I was mildly underimpressed, based on the advance buzz on it. Much of the YA sf community seemed to be gushing about it, but it left me with a feeling that I wanted more, which is what I mean when I say it galloped by. The action felt rushed. The main climax (overcoming the Big Bad) was just "zap" and it was done. I'm usually grateful when a fantasy is a stand-alone and the first book in a series isn't all about establishing the characters and setting and creating a lot of suspense for the next two, but with this book I would have maybe liked a little more of that and less breathless action that once or twice left me flipping back through going "what just happened?" I liked it enough that I think I'll read the next one, except that I think I've read people saying that the next one isn't as good... Anyway. It was fun. I definitely liked it a lot; I just didn't love it.
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Tuesday, January 19th, 2010 08:04 am
Lavinia, Ursula K. Le Guin

Lavinia is austere, meticulously researched, beautifully written, but for the most part curiously uninvolving.

Perhaps my greatest complaint about it is that although Le Guin sets out to give a voice to a voiceless character from Vergil's Aenead, the king's daughter whom Aeneas wins in order to found the Roman empire, I finish the book feeling that I don't really know Lavinia any better than I did at the start. She never comes alive, except as a quiet, curiously passive woman who moves through the pages observing the tumult swirling around her. We are meant to feel a great love affair between her and Aeneas, but we are not given any real stake in it.

As a critical reader, I can not help but admire Le Guin's prose. She is a great stylist, and you can feel the careful craft behind every sentence. It's a long time since I read Vergil in Latin, but I sensed that certain passages were direct translations. All in all, this novel read a little like an academic exercise in scholarship and clear, luminous prose.

There is an emotional pay-off at the end that makes up for quite a bit, but I'm not sure I'd recommend the novel to anyone except those interested in the period or who, like me, are long-time admirers of Le Guin's work.
intertext: (gorey dog and book)
Friday, January 8th, 2010 01:43 pm
Hilary Mantel, Wolf Hall

MMMMmmmm. So good.

I am sorry to finish it, because I have been immersed in the period and in the characters, especially the character of Thomas Cromwell. It's one of those books where it's so great knowing that you have it sitting on your bedside table to read every night. I loved the very tight point of view - you quickly notice that any time there's a dangling "he" it refers to Cromwell. Most of it is very much inside his head. And it's a fascinating head to be inside, intelligent and cunning and observant. I am aware that some people read this as a white-wash of Cromwell, as a counter to the popular image of Thomas More. It's a long time since I saw A Man For All Seasons, or Anne of a Thousand Days, for that matter, and I've never bothered with The Tudors, and don't know enough about the period to be able to argue for one side or the other. I liked this Thomas Cromwell a lot. I'm glad there's to be a sequel, as I want to read more (though in another way, I'm not sure I do...)
I have to thank my friend [livejournal.com profile] lidocafe for giving Wolf Hall to me for Christmas, because I loved it, and could never have finished it in a week from the library, and have enjoyed the luxury of savouring it.

I don't know what I'm going to read next.
intertext: (gorey books)
Saturday, January 2nd, 2010 01:58 pm
Photo Impressionism and The Subjective Image Freeman Patterson and Andre Gallant.

Freeman Patterson has been a photographic hero of mine since the Seventies, when I first took up photography seriously and when his Photography and the Art of Seeing was something of a Bible for me. I always enjoy not just looking at his photographs but reading his advice and his philosophy (he's one of those with somewhat zen-like ideas about art).

I liked one half of this more than the other. The first half is devoted to extremely abstract work created by doing things with multiple exposures and moving the camera while exposing. Not so much my cup of tea. The half devoted to "the subjective image" is wonderful and inspiring. Even though published in 2001, it's resolutely film based - I'd be interested to read an updated version that allowed for digital techniques (though I think Patterson still does much of his work with a film camera). Many of the ideas here could be adapted with Photoshop.